🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are increasingly allowing the far right to set the public discourse, according to a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited radical groups by validating their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German publications.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the far right moved from fringe issues in the late 1990s to core themes like integration and immigration, established parties progressively adapted their messaging in response.

This adjustment amplified the spread of these ideas and indicated to the electorate that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was evident even when mainstream parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Normalisation Effect Throughout Europe

While the research was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to affect countries across Europe.

"You see this a lot in European media," explained another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everyone starts talking about it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the radical right.

In a recently published discussion, a former German chancellor called for widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be observed across the continent, as elected officials from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic embrace the language of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the radical right, despite studies suggests that doing so leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of data gathered showed that the impact of radical parties had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "But if you hear this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Established Groups to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their own discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."