🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in other member states